AskMyChurch← AskMyChurch

AskMyChurch vs Gloo on Church Data Privacy

AskMyChurch is anonymous by default — no data on the person asking. Gloo is a data platform with a thorough privacy policy. The difference is architecture.

AskMyChurch and Gloo handle congregant data in opposite ways: AskMyChurch is anonymous by default — no accounts, no names, no device tracking — so there is no profile of the person asking to protect, leak, or subpoena. Gloo is a platform that collects and connects data across a large faith ecosystem and governs it with a genuinely thorough privacy policy. Neither company is hiding anything. The difference is architecture: one protects data with rules, the other never collects it. We've compared the two products head-to-head elsewhere; this page is about one question only — what happens to the data of the person typing.

Two models, stated plainly

Gloo describes itself as "the technology platform serving the faith ecosystem," serving more than 450,000 churches, nonprofits, and faith-based organizations. The model is connection: churches, ministries, content, and AI tools plugged into one platform, with data moving between them under Gloo's policies. For churches that means Gloo Workspace, Content Studio, Ministry Chat, and dashboards to track church health.

AskMyChurch is one narrow thing: an assistant on your church's own website that answers questions using only your published content and sermons — the front door of your church, always open. It never invents answers, hands off to a real person, and answers in English and Spanish. Messages that read like a crisis route to 988 and the Crisis Text Line — hard-coded, in English and Spanish, before any AI responds.

What Gloo's own documents say (as of this writing)

We read Gloo's Privacy Statement (effective December 16, 2025) and its Data Privacy FAQ this week. In their words:

• Gloo does not sell personal data: "We do not sell your personal information or disclose it to third parties under the circumstances that would be considered a sale under applicable law." The FAQ adds that Gloo does not engage in data-broker activities.
• It collects a lot, because the platform runs on it: identifiers, demographics, device data, usage, geolocation, and "requests for connections to certain organizations along with information regarding your specific concerns or needs."
• It shares with partners: "campaign partners, event referral partners… and larger parent or network organizations," and account information can be visible to others inside an organization.
• It can share anonymized data on its own terms: "We may share anonymized or aggregated data at our discretion, in accordance with applicable laws."
• It brings in outside data: the FAQ says Gloo licenses personal information from data providers, with names and contact details removed.
• It treats religious affiliation and health as sensitive, and says it does not use sensitive personal information "except with your consent to provide the Services that you requested."

One thing we could not find on the pages we read: a specific statement about what happens to AI chat conversation data. It may exist elsewhere in their documentation; as of this writing we didn't find it, so we won't characterize it.

What AskMyChurch does with congregant data

There is no shorter privacy story to tell. The person asking is anonymous by default — no account, no name, no device tracking, no profile. The church sees themes, not people: "three people asked about grief this month," never who, never their words tied to a name. Answers come only from the church's own website and sermons, with cite-to-the-minute sermon links, so nothing about the congregant has to leave the conversation for the answer to be good.

That design came from what we kept finding on church websites themselves. In June 2026 we scanned 296 reachable church homepages: 77.7% carried at least one third-party tracker, and 25.3% — one in four — carried the Meta (Facebook) pixel, an advertising and identity tracker usually installed to promote an event and then forgotten. Almost no church chose to watch the person quietly reading the "I need prayer" page; the tools they installed just do that by default. We built the assistant so there would be nothing to watch.

Credit where it's due

Gloo's privacy documentation is better than most of church tech. A full privacy statement, a plain-English data privacy FAQ, published data-protection standards, a data processing agreement, and a security statement covering encryption in transit and at rest — that is more than many vendors in this space publish at all, and naming religious affiliation as sensitive data is exactly right. If your church joins a data platform, join one that writes this much down. Gloo does.

Who should pick which

Pick Gloo if you want the ecosystem: one platform for ministry chat, content, outreach, and church-health dashboards, with a large partner network and data governance you can actually read. Pick AskMyChurch if the thing sitting on your website should know nothing about the person typing: anonymous by default, answers only from your own content, crisis routing before any AI in English and Spanish, and a real person one step away. Plans are $99, $249, or $500 per month by weekend attendance (Base under 500, Growth 500–2,000, Premium 2,000+ or multi-campus), with a 30-day free trial, a money-back guarantee, and cancel anytime — see askmy.church.

Some churches will want both models in different places. Just know which one is at your front door.

Gloo facts verified July 2026 from gloo.com (home, /churches, /legal/privacy-statement, /legal/data-privacy-faq, /legal/security-statement). The quotes are theirs; "as of this writing" means exactly that.

Frequently asked

Updated 2026-06-26 · AskMyChurch by Vision Genesis · Knoxville, TN

See it answer — try a live demo →